by: Woody Hutsell, appICU.com
I have many mixed feelings on this topic that I thought I would share.
- I think NVMe-oF will make a positive impact on application performance.
- I have lived through the early days of other protocols and this one is no different: immature standards, proprietary solutions, and slow customer adoption.
- I believe vendors will offer a bunch of NVMe-oF enabled solutions. Most of them won’t make any sense. NVMe-oF is about shaving latency. If the solution being paired with NVMe-oF is loaded with latency from poorly implemented architectures and slow storage services, adding NVMe-oF will hardly make a difference.
- The wide range of NVMe-oF options is an impediment to its success: InfiniBand, RoCE, iWARP, FC-NVMe, and more on the way. The fact that different vendors are throwing their weight into different protocols is also not helping.
- The focus on lower latency for the customer is positive and I am delighted to see the storage industry refocused on latency even if these are the same people I heard mutter that latency under 500 microseconds doesn’t matter.
- Don’t be one of those people who says NVMe when you mean NVMe-oF. I have seen industry experts get lost in the terminology.